ASUS HD 7970 DirectCU II 28nm Graphics Card Review

Benchmarks - Aliens vs. Predator

Aliens vs. Predator utilizes Rebellion Developments' Asura engine to create detailed textural environments which use DirectX 11 and advanced (and demanding) graphical techniques such as tessellation.

All of the settings for the benchmarking tool were set to their highest values, which is "3" in the configuration file setup at a resolution of 1920x1080.

avp

Again, the 7970 DCUII posts impressive results which lend to a fluid experience of this tesselation-heavy and beautiful graphics engine.   At stock settings the card pushes 70 FPS average, which is a whopping 62.7% improvement over a GTX 660.  The overclock delivers another 24.5% performance increase ontop of that for a very comfy average framerate just shy of 90 FPS.

You have no rights to post comments

Comments   

 
# Nikolaj 2013-03-08 06:17
Hi guys, nice review but what about VRM temps ?

It's a huge issue on these models. To be straight ti the point: http://www.xtremehardware.com/recensioni/schede-video/arctic-cooling-hybrid-7970-pt-ii-test-accessori-e-confronto-con-asus-7970dc2t-201211157843/?start=10

ASUS DCT2T, 60 degrees on the core and 100 degress on the VRM section. That's a huge amount and this is why they limited the Over-Voltage capabilities. If being overclocked at 1GHz with 1.112mV it generates 74/112 degrees celsius for core/VRM

note: che first setting it's blank due a graph error but as you can see in the other images it's "ASUS HD7970-DC2T-3GD 5 AUTO/40%, 1974 RPM"

The 7970, as it's shown in your review, it's a very solid performer. Good day
 
 
# Ivan 2013-03-09 07:08
please stop with this rumor, those temperature are due to an error as stated many times bu asus, if you use the correct GPU tweak you will see that they never goes over 78 degree in my case...
please avoid missinformation
 
 
# Nikolaj 2013-03-09 12:18
Quoting Ivan:
please stop with this rumor, those temperature are due to an error as stated many times bu asus, if you use the correct GPU tweak you will see that they never goes over 78 degree in my case...
please avoid missinformation


Hi Ivan

Show me something, a link to an Asus Statement or something like that. I've never heard of such clarification, would you be so kind to show it ?

If you're right, this should mean that eveery VRM sensor mounted on the Gigabyte and Asus, or even 7970 reference designs, should have some issues. As you can see from the graphs, ad stock speeds it's all right for gigabyte 797OC-3GD but if overclocked it behaves similar to the Asus one.

Have you made personal tests that proove that the sensors are broken ?

What I've posted it's what I've seen also on other designs, not only Asus and if you check the ROG forums it's full of reports, like this one (7950 DCII model, faulty design): http://www.behardware.com/news/12153/asus-hd-7950-directcu-ii-fault-report.html

It's not a ''rumour'' if it happens to an entire comunity ;)

Another link, HWINFO program tells the same story (it could be obviously the same sensor, but it's not a software related problem): http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1670759&page=22

In this lik there's a person which states what I've seen on my test lab, Gigabyte 797OC-3GB capable of heat the VRM section at 65 degrees with the stock settings.

I suggest you to read carefully hte review, the Arctic Cooling accelero Hybrid it was installed in the gigabyte 7970 797OC-3GD not the Asus DC2T.

I suppose that you're referring to the Core temps, since that GPU Tweak only reports it, and it's perfecly in-line with the temperatures reported in the review.

Before stating that what I've done is misinformation, please let us know about what you're talking about.

Many thanks in advance
 
 
# laur 2013-03-09 05:47
Nice part about the power phase current capacity, i hope you write abut it on every card reviewed on the site.- that's good info.